Comparison
Funded With Forex vs FTMO
One of the longest running firms in the category, offering both a one step and a two step evaluation with a large international customer base. Here is how the rules line up, including where they beat us.
Most comparisons in this category are written to make one firm look good. This one lists where FTMO beats us, because you are going to find that out anyway and it is better that you find it here.
FTMO figures were read from their official page on 2026-08-10. Prop firms change their rules often, so check the current terms there before you buy. Where we have not verified a figure we say so rather than guess.
Rules side by side
| Rule | Funded With Forex | FTMO |
|---|---|---|
| Max loss floorA static floor is fixed the day you start. A trailing floor rises as your equity rises, so profit moves the line you can be stopped at. | Static, never moves against you | Trailing on one step, static on two step |
| Max lossThe total distance from your starting balance to account failure. | 6% one step, 10% two step | 10% |
| Daily loss limitThe single most common cause of a failed evaluation. | 3% one step, 5% two step | 3% (one step), 5% (two step) |
| Profit targetWhat you have to make to clear the evaluation. | 10% one step, 8% then 5% two step | 10% (one step), 10% then 5% (two step) |
| Consistency ruleCaps how much of your result one strong day can contribute. | 50% on evaluations, none once funded | Best Day Rule, no single day above 50% of profitable days |
| Minimum trading daysHow long before you can pass or withdraw. | 2 on the one step evaluation | None on one step, 4 on two step |
| Profit splitYour share of the performance fees you generate. | Up to 90% | Up to 90% |
| Floor after payoutWhether clearing a withdrawal leaves you more room or less. | Resets to your new equity, so a payout increases your cushion | See their site |
| 100K priceWhat the largest evaluation costs. | $110 with FWF40, from $184 | See their site |
Where FTMO beats us
- They have operated for far longer and have a much larger public payout record. If length of track record is your first filter, that is a real and fair reason to choose them.
- Their one step has no minimum trading day requirement, so a fast passer can clear it quicker than ours.
- They support a wider range of instruments and platforms than we currently do.
Where we think we are stronger
- Our max loss floor is static on every product. Their one step uses a trailing floor that follows your equity up, so a winning run raises the line you can be stopped out at.
- Our funded accounts carry no consistency rule at all. One strong day can be your whole month.
- Our drawdown floor resets to your new equity after a payout, so clearing a withdrawal leaves you with more cushion rather than less.
What actually matters when you compare firms
Almost everyone compares on price and profit split, which are the two things least likely to decide whether you get paid. The rules that end accounts are the drawdown shape and the daily loss limit.
A static max loss floor is set the day your account opens and never changes. You can write the failure balance on a sticky note and it will still be correct in six months. A trailing floor climbs behind your equity, so a good week raises the level at which you get stopped out and a normal pullback can end an account that is still up overall. Funded With Forex uses a static floor on every product, evaluation and funded.
The second thing to check is what happens after you get paid. Most firms leave your floor where it was, so every withdrawal shrinks your cushion. Ours resets to your new equity, which means clearing a payout leaves you with more room to trade rather than less.
The third is the consistency rule. Ours applies to evaluations only, capping any single day at 50% of the profit target, so passing takes at least two profitable days. Once you are funded it is gone entirely and one strong day can be your whole month.
The honest summary
We are not the cheapest and we do not advertise the highest split. What we sell is a rule set that does not move once you have paid for it, published in plain dollars before you buy, on an evaluation that costs $110 at the largest size rather than the price of the account itself.
If FTMO fits how you trade, use them. If you have been stopped out by a floor that moved while you were profitable, that is the specific thing we built differently.
Common questions
Is Funded With Forex better than FTMO?
Neither is better in the abstract, so it depends on what ends your accounts. Funded With Forex uses a static max loss floor that never moves against you, and applies no consistency rule once you are funded. On the other side: they have operated for far longer and have a much larger public payout record. If length of track record is your first filter, that is a real and fair reason to choose them. The useful question is which rule shape suits how you actually trade, not which headline price is lower.
What is the difference between a static and a trailing drawdown?
A static floor is fixed when your account opens and never changes, so you always know the exact balance at which the account fails. A trailing floor follows your equity upward, which means profitable trading raises the level you can be stopped out at. Funded With Forex uses a static floor on every product.
Does Funded With Forex have a consistency rule?
Yes on evaluations and no once funded. During an evaluation no single day can contribute more than 50% of the profit target, which means passing requires at least two profitable days. Once you are funded there is no consistency cap at all, so one strong day can account for your entire month.
Is this real money trading?
No. Every account is simulated and runs against live market data. No customer funds are deposited or placed at risk. Traders who qualify receive performance based incentive payments from Funded With Forex operating capital.
FTMO is a trademark of its respective owner and is not affiliated with, and does not endorse, Funded With Forex. All figures are quoted from public sources on the date shown and may have changed. All trading described is simulated. Nothing here is financial advice.